Instagram embeds don’t violate copyright laws, court rules

Instagram logo with geometric design background
Illustration by Alex Castro / The Verge

Instagram isn’t liable for copyright infringement when images are embedded on third-party websites, the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled on Monday (via Torrent Freak). The decision came in response to a class action lawsuit filed by two photographers, Alexis Hunley and Matthew Brauer, who accused Instagram of violating copyright laws by enabling Time and BuzzFeed News to embed their copyrighted photos in online articles.

In 2016, Time published an article titled “These Photographers Are Covering the Presidential Campaign on Instagram,” which included Brauer’s embedded Instagram photo of Hillary Clinton. BuzzFeed News similarly posted an embedded photo taken by Hunley in its 2020 article about the Black Lives Matter protests.

However, Hunley and Brauer argued BuzzFeed News and Time embedded these posts on their websites without obtaining the proper license. The pair accused Instagram of secondary copyright infringement as a result, with Hunley alleging that Instagram “intentionally and brazenly encouraged, aided and induced” third-party websites to embed copyrighted images “without making any effort to control or stop the rampant infringement.”

The court ultimately ruled that Instagram couldn’t be held liable for secondary copyright infringement in this case, as it found that “embedding a photo does not ‘display a copy’ of the underlying images.” In its ruling, the court cited 2007’s Perfect 10 v. Amazon, a landmark case that established the “server test,” which affirms that a website can’t be held accountable for infringement as long as the copyrighted work isn’t stored on its server.

While the server test has saved numerous websites, including Google and Mashable, from legal trouble over embedded images, some courts have pushed back on the concept in recent years. In 2018, a New York district court judge interpreted the server test differently and ruled that embedding a tweet on a webpage could count as copyright infringement. Meanwhile, US District Judge Jed Rakoff rejected the server test in a ruling last year, stating that the rule is “contrary to the text and legislative history of the Copyright Act.”



* This article was originally published here

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Threads is getting an edit button — and you don’t have to pay for it

Image
Illustration: The Verge Meta is starting to roll out an edit feature and “Voice Threads” for its Threads platform, CEO Mark Zuckerberg announced on Thursday . They’re two major new features for Meta’s burgeoning X-like social network — and unlike on X (formerly Twitter), you won’t need to pay a subscription fee to be able to edit your posts for five minutes after they’re published. Posts that are edited will have a little icon next to the timestamp showing that they’ve been revised. You aren’t be able to see an edit history — that’s one advantage X still has over Threads — and Meta spokesperson currently doesn’t have plans to add one, Christine Pai tells The Verge. Post by Richard Lawler / The Verge, screenshot by Jay Peters / The Verge See that icon next to the timestamp? That’s how you know a Threads post has been edited. Still, I’ll give Meta some credit for taking months to launch an edit button instead of years; Twitter adde
Read more

Facebook’s new AI-generated stickers are lewd, rude, and occasionally nude

Image
Would you believe this was probably the safest image we could have used here? | Image: Meta / @Pioldes Some early user tests for Meta’s new AI-generated sticker tool have resulted in some dubious (and rather hilarious) creations. After gaining access to the new AI-generated sticker tool on Facebook Messenger, X user @Pioldes was able to create a host of inappropriate sticker images — including child soldiers, gun-wielding Nintendo characters, Mickey Mouse taking a crap , and nude illustrations of Canadian prime minister Justin Trudeau. Other examples show that Meta’s AI-sticker tool will also happily slap a pair of breasts onto…well, just about anything, judging by the busty images of Sonic the Hedgehog and Karl Marx . There’s even a sticker that depicts a woman breastfeeding Pikachu. found out that facebook messenger has ai generated stickers now and I don't think anyone involved has thought anything through pic.twitter.com/co987cRhyu — podesbiens.
Read more

Meta will let EU users unlink their Instagram, Facebook, and Messenger info ahead of DMA

Image
Image: Meta EU users will be able to unlink their Instagram and Facebook accounts, as well as other Meta services ahead of the bloc’s new Digital Markets Act (DMA) coming into force in March, the company has announced . The changes will apply in the European Union, European Economic Area, and Switzerland, and notifications informing users of the change will appear in the coming weeks. The changes mean that EU users will be able to use many of Meta’s services without their information being shared between them. People will be able to use Facebook Messenger as a stand-alone service without a Facebook account, for example, and if they’ve previously linked their Facebook and Instagram accounts they’ll be able to unlink them. ( Meta’s help page notes that linking accounts like this is used for features like targeting ads, personalizing content recommendations, and sharing posts). Less data linkage, but also less functionality Facebook Marketplace and Facebook Ga
Read more